Luvris AI

The problem

A law firm's information already exists. It is simply not in one place. Court portals each have their own login and their own rules, publications arrive with no deadline attached, client messages live outside any record, and the deadline itself sits in somebody's head — counted on their fingers, in business days.

The work is not finding the information. It is noticing, in time, what the information requires.

Deadlines that are calculated, not copied

From a lawyer's registration number, Luvris follows Brazil's national electronic judicial gazette and turns each publication into a deadline with a date, a count and a legal basis. Business days, with national and state holidays in the arithmetic — the due date is a result, not an estimate.

Every deadline shows the article that supports it, and every count is recorded: what was read, when, and how the number was reached.

Crossing sources instead of trusting one

The same case movement appears differently in each system, and sometimes appears in only one of them. Luvris reads the public and authorised sources — the national gazette, the CNJ's public database, court portals, and the firm's own documents — compares what each says, and records the divergence when there is one.

What it refuses to do

The product declares its own limits in public, which is unusual for anything with AI in the name. It does not predict how a case will be decided, does not reach into sealed proceedings, does not file anything, and does not prospect for clients.

Drafts come out for review, not for filing. Calculations show their working. Every output is an input to a lawyer's work, never a procedural act — because the person who signs is the person who answers for it, and they have to be able to check each step.